READY COMPUTING LIMITED modern slavery statement summary (2026)
Organisation address
Moulsham Mill, Suite M2.02, Parkway,
Chelmsford,
England,
CM2 7PX
Chelmsford,
England,
CM2 7PX
We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.
This statement provides information for all 6 recommended topics
What is a modern slavery statement?
UK law requires certain organisations to publish an annual modern slavery statement on their website, setting out the steps they are taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains.
Read more in the government guidance on publishing modern slavery statements.
Get the full statement
To request a copy of the organisation’s full statement, email:
anthony.simonetta@readycomputing.com
Why is there no link to the statement on the organisation's website?
This organisation does not have a website, so we cannot provide a URL linking to the full statement on its website.
Organisations that do not have a website, but are required by law to publish a modern slavery statement, must provide a copy of the statement in writing to anyone who requests one within 30 days.
PDF version of the statement
Warning
The file has been uploaded directly by READY COMPUTING LIMITED and has not been reviewed, assessed or moderated by the Home Office for suitability and accessibility.
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact READY COMPUTING LIMITED for further assistance.
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact READY COMPUTING LIMITED for further assistance.
About this statement summary
All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.
Contents
- Legal requirement to publish
- Statement period and sign-off details
- Recommended topics covered by the statement
- The organisation’s sectors and turnover
- Number of years producing statements
- Policies
- Training
- Monitoring working conditions
- Modern slavery risks
- Finding indicators of modern slavery
- Demonstrating progress
Legal requirement to publish
Published voluntarily
READY COMPUTING LIMITED has confirmed it is not required to publish a 2026 statement by law.
Statement period and sign-off details
The statement covers the following period:
1 January 2025 to 31 December 2025
The statement was signed off by:
Anthony Simonetta (VP of Compliance and Risk Management)
It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
9 November 2026
Recommended topics covered by the statement
Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of topics in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended topics in the statutory guidance.
We asked the organisation to tell us which topics its statement covers.
| Topics recommended by government guidance | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains | Covered |
| Policies | Covered |
| Risk assessment | Covered |
| Due diligence (steps to address risk) | Covered |
| Training about modern slavery | Covered |
| Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time | Covered |
The organisation’s sectors and turnover
Sectors
The organisation operates in the following sectors:
- Healthcare and pharmaceuticals
- Information technology and telecommunication
Turnover
Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:
Under £36 million
If the organisation is a public body, this amount is based on the organisation’s budget for the year of the statement.
What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?
If this is a group statement, this includes the total turnover for all the organisations covered by the statement.
Number of years producing statements
The organisation has been producing modern slavery statements for the following number of years:
1 to 5 years
How does this work for group statements?
If the statement is for a group of organisations, this answer applies to the organisation with the longest history of producing statements.
Policies (optional)
We asked the organisation whether its policies include the following provisions in relation to its domestic and international supply chains, as well as its own operations.
| Policy provisions we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Freedom of workers to terminate employment | Included |
| Freedom of movement | Included |
| Freedom of association | Included |
| Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation | Included |
| Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees | Included |
| Prohibits compulsory overtime | Included |
| Prohibits child labour | Included |
| Prohibits discrimination | Included |
| Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents | Included |
| Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery | Included |
| Other |
Not included
|
Training (optional)
We asked the organisation whether it provided training on modern slavery, and who it was for.
What counts as training?
We explained that by ‘training’ we meant anything designed to increase knowledge and skills around identifying, addressing or preventing modern slavery risks.
This could range from formal training courses to broader awareness-raising activities such as workshops or webinars.
| We asked who the training was for | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Your whole organisation | Yes |
| Your front line staff | No |
| Human resources | No |
| Executive-level staff | No |
| Procurement staff | No |
| Your suppliers | No |
| The wider community | No |
| Other |
No
|
Monitoring working conditions (optional)
Engaging with others
We asked the organisation to tell us who it engaged with to help monitor working conditions across its operations and supply chains.
| We asked who the organisation engaged with | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Your suppliers | Yes |
| Trade unions or worker representative groups | No |
| Civil society organisations | No |
| Professional auditors | No |
| Workers within your organisation | Yes |
| Workers within your supply chain | No |
| Central or local government | No |
| Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates | No |
| Businesses in your industry or sector | No |
Social audits
We asked the organisation to tell us about any social audits it used to look for signs of modern slavery.
What are social audits?
A social audit is a review of an organisation’s working practices from the point of view of social responsibility, and should include an evaluation of working conditions in the organisation’s operations and supply chains.
By their nature, audits of supplier workplaces represent a snapshot in time.
| Social audits we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Audit conducted by your staff | Yes |
| Third party audit arranged by your organisation | No |
| Audit conducted by your supplier’s staff | No |
| Third party audit arranged by your supplier | No |
| Announced audit | No |
| Unannounced audit | No |
Grievance mechanisms
We asked the organisation how workers in its operations or supply chains could raise concerns or make complaints.
| We asked if workers could raise concerns this way | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app | Yes |
| Through trade unions or other worker representative groups | No |
Other ways of monitoring working conditions
We asked the organisation whether it had any other ways of monitoring working conditions across its operations and supply chains:
As a remote organization, Ready Computing monitored working conditions across our operation and supply chains through our Supply Chain Risk Management and Vendor Management programs.
Modern slavery risks (optional)
Warning
Identifying modern slavery risks is a vital step towards eradicating it.
The government encourages organisations to be as open and transparent as possible, to improve understanding, collaboration and best practice around tackling this worldwide problem.
We asked the organisation to describe up to 3 priority risks it focused on during the period of the statement, including details of the affected workers, the activity involved, and the location.
Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)
Contingent tech workers engaged via international Employer of Record (EOR) agencies across Europe and Latin America.
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur |
Organisation’s response:
Within your supply chains.
|
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country | Organisation’s response: United Kingdom |
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: We enforce strict anti-slavery governance under CORP POL-0015 and VM POL-0001. All international Employer of Record (EOR) partners must contractually prohibit worker-paid recruitment fees, wage deductions, and document retention. Through Ironclad and NetSuite ERP gating, we mandate transparent compensation terms, verify right-to-work, and ensure all remote contingent talent have access to anonymous whistleblower channels (CORP REC-0043) and free labor exit rights. |
Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)
Subcontracted software developers and technical staff engaged through specialized IT resourcing partners in the UK.
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur |
Organisation’s response:
Within your supply chains.
|
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country | Organisation’s response: United Kingdom |
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: We mitigate UK staffing risk via QMS PLN-0007 and VM PROC-0002. Subcontractors undergo pre-engagement vetting, right-to-work verification, and statutory screening (QMS REC-0034). Through Ironclad, we flow down mandatory UK Modern Slavery Act compliance and FAR anti-trafficking clauses, legally obligating staffing partners to guarantee voluntary overtime, transparent contracts, fair wages, and freedom of association, backed by second-party audit rights and annual risk reviews. |
Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)
Distributed independent contractors onboarded across remote global locations without pre-engagement labor vetting.
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur |
Organisation’s response:
Within your supply chains.
|
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country |
Organisation’s response:
|
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: We enforce centralized contractor oversight under HR POL-0005 and CORP POL-0015. Decentralized contractor onboarding is blocked via automated NetSuite ERP procurement gates and mandatory Ironclad legal contracting (LEG PROC-0001). We mandate standardized Statements of Work, verify independent classification, prohibit wage withholding or recruitment fees, and require screening against federal exclusion lists (HR PROC-0012). Contractors have full access to our anonymous reporting hotlines. |
Indicators of forced labour (optional)
We asked the organisation whether its statement refers to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.
What are ILO indicators of forced labour?
The International Labour Organization (ILO) has produced a list of the most common signs of forced labour.
They’re based on the definition of forced labour as ‘all work or service which is extracted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.’
More details and guidance are available on the ILO website, and in their publication ILO indicators of forced labour
Organisation’s response
The organisation told us its statement does not refer to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.
Demonstrating progress (optional)
We asked the organisation how its statement demonstrates progress over time in addressing modern slavery risks.
They provided the following answer:
We track progress via our KPI and Metrics Catalogue (QMS REC-0061), rolling supply chain and labor telemetry into Level 2 Integrated Objective IO-0005 (Managing Risk Proactively). We measure 100% completion of annual workforce ethics training (QMS POL-0015), pre-contract supplier risk assessments (VM PROC-0002), and quarterly scorecards for high-risk agencies. Progress goals include annual re-screening of active vendors against exclusion lists and expanding sub-tier flow-down audits.