Communaute LTD modern slavery statement summary (2026)

Organisation address
14801 Califa Street,
Van Nuys,
California,
United States,
91411

We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.

This statement provides information for all 6 recommended topics

What is a modern slavery statement?
UK law requires certain organisations to publish an annual modern slavery statement on their website, setting out the steps they are taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read more in the government guidance on publishing modern slavery statements.
Link to full statement
Go to full modern slavery statement on organisation’s website

PDF version of the statement

Warning The file has been uploaded directly by Communaute LTD and has not been reviewed, assessed or moderated by the Home Office for suitability and accessibility.
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact Communaute LTD for further assistance.
Download

Signed DOEN Consolidated Modern Slavery and Supply Chain Transparency Statement .pdf

File uploaded: 07 July 2026 at 10:40pm
PDF | 292.95 KB

Download file

About this statement summary

All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.

Contents

Statement period and sign-off details

The statement covers the following period:
1 January 2025 to 31 December 2025

The statement was signed off by:
Margaret Kleveland (CEO)

It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
30 June 2026

Recommended topics covered by the statement

Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of topics in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended topics in the statutory guidance.

We asked the organisation to tell us which topics its statement covers.

Topics recommended by government guidance Organisation’s response
The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains Covered
Policies Covered
Risk assessment Covered
Due diligence (steps to address risk) Covered
Training about modern slavery Covered
Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time Covered

The organisation’s sectors and turnover

Sectors

The organisation operates in the following sectors:

  • Fashion, textiles, apparel and luxury goods

Turnover

Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:

£100 million to £500 million

If the organisation is a public body, this amount is based on the organisation’s budget for the year of the statement.
What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?
If this is a group statement, this includes the total turnover for all the organisations covered by the statement.

Number of years producing statements

The organisation has been producing modern slavery statements for the following number of years:
This is the first time
How does this work for group statements?
If the statement is for a group of organisations, this answer applies to the organisation with the longest history of producing statements.

Policies (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its policies include the following provisions in relation to its domestic and international supply chains, as well as its own operations.
Policy provisions we asked about Organisation’s response
Freedom of workers to terminate employment Included
Freedom of movement Included
Freedom of association Included
Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation Included
Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees Included
Prohibits compulsory overtime Included
Prohibits child labour Included
Prohibits discrimination Included
Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents Included
Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery Included
Other
Not included

Training (optional)

We asked the organisation whether it provided training on modern slavery, and who it was for.
What counts as training?
We explained that by ‘training’ we meant anything designed to increase knowledge and skills around identifying, addressing or preventing modern slavery risks. This could range from formal training courses to broader awareness-raising activities such as workshops or webinars.
We asked who the training was for Organisation’s response
Your whole organisation No
Your front line staff No
Human resources No
Executive-level staff No
Procurement staff Yes
Your suppliers No
The wider community No
Other
No

Monitoring working conditions (optional)

Engaging with others

We asked the organisation to tell us who it engaged with to help monitor working conditions across its operations and supply chains.
We asked who the organisation engaged with Organisation’s response
Your suppliers Yes
Trade unions or worker representative groups No
Civil society organisations Yes
Professional auditors Yes
Workers within your organisation Yes
Workers within your supply chain Yes
Central or local government No
Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates No
Businesses in your industry or sector No

Social audits

We asked the organisation to tell us about any social audits it used to look for signs of modern slavery.
What are social audits?
A social audit is a review of an organisation’s working practices from the point of view of social responsibility, and should include an evaluation of working conditions in the organisation’s operations and supply chains. By their nature, audits of supplier workplaces represent a snapshot in time.
Social audits we asked about Organisation’s response
Audit conducted by your staff No
Third party audit arranged by your organisation Yes
Audit conducted by your supplier’s staff No
Third party audit arranged by your supplier No
Announced audit Yes
Unannounced audit No

Grievance mechanisms

We asked the organisation how workers in its operations or supply chains could raise concerns or make complaints.
We asked if workers could raise concerns this way Organisation’s response
Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app Yes
Through trade unions or other worker representative groups No

Other ways of monitoring working conditions

We asked the organisation whether it had any other ways of monitoring working conditions across its operations and supply chains:
Organisation’s response
The organisation did not answer this question.

Modern slavery risks (optional)

Warning Identifying modern slavery risks is a vital step towards eradicating it. The government encourages organisations to be as open and transparent as possible, to improve understanding, collaboration and best practice around tackling this worldwide problem.
We asked the organisation to describe up to 3 priority risks it focused on during the period of the statement, including details of the affected workers, the activity involved, and the location.

Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)

Industry research has demonstrated there is a risk of forced labour in cotton value chains, although we have not identified any in our own value chains.
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Organisation selected ‘Other’ and wrote:
Tier 2 and beyond, indirect suppliers, non-contracted relationships
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Women
  • Migrants
In which country Organisation’s response: China
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: Research has shown that upstream apparel supply chains, particularly cotton supply chains, have heightened forced labor risks. While we do not have contracted relationships with those beyond Tier 1, we know it is critical to strengthen monitoring systems. We require all direct suppliers to commit to our Supplier Code of Conduct, which explicitly prohibits forced labor and violations of labor rights. We expect these standards to be communicated and implemented throughout the supply chain.

Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)

Industry research has demonstrated there is a risk of modern slavery in leather value chains, particularly in Italy, Bangladesh, and India, although we have not identified any in our own value chains.
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Organisation selected ‘Other’ and wrote:
Tier 2 and beyond, indirect suppliers, non-contracted relationships
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Migrants
  • Refugees
In which country Organisation’s response:
  • India
  • Italy
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: We continue to strengthen due diligence within our leather supply chains by improving visibility beyond Tier 1 and assessing labor risks associated with Tier 2 and Tier 3 processing. This includes increased attention to regions where migrant and refugee workers may face heightened vulnerability to exploitation, including parts of India and Italy, to better inform supplier engagement and risk management.

Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)

Upstream artisanal supply chains generally have less regulatory and labor oversight, but we have not identified any modern slavery risks in our suppliers.
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains.
  • Tier 1 suppliers
    Provide their products and services directly to your organisation.
  • Tier 2 suppliers
    Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 1 suppliers.
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Women
In which country Organisation’s response:
  • Madagascar
  • Peru
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: We recognize that artisan supply chains and small workshops can present risks related to informal labor arrangements, subcontracting, and limited oversight. At the same time, they provide important livelihoods, particularly for women, and help preserve traditional craftsmanship. We use supplier engagement, audits, and site visits to strengthen oversight while supporting responsible sourcing practices upstream.

Indicators of forced labour (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its statement refers to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.
What are ILO indicators of forced labour?
The International Labour Organization (ILO) has produced a list of the most common signs of forced labour. They’re based on the definition of forced labour as ‘all work or service which is extracted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.’ More details and guidance are available on the ILO website, and in their publication ILO indicators of forced labour
Organisation’s response
The organisation told us its statement does not refer to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.

Demonstrating progress (optional)

We asked the organisation how its statement demonstrates progress over time in addressing modern slavery risks. They provided the following answer:
Progress against these objectives will be monitored through key performance indicators, including supplier engagement or participation rates, number of actionable findings identified through forced labor assessments, percentage of suppliers and employees trained on new due diligence systems, audit and corrective action closure rates, and improvements in supply chain traceability and visibility.