The Shropshire Group modern slavery statement summary (2022)
Organisation address
Ely,
South Yorkshire,
United Kingdom,
CB7 5TZ
We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.
This statement provides information for all 6 recommended topics
What is a modern slavery statement?
PDF version of the statement (optional)
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact The Shropshire Group for further assistance.
Gs Modern Slavery Statement 2022.pdf
File uploaded: 02 November 2022 at 11:07am
PDF
| 3.35 MB
About this statement summary
All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.
Contents
- Organisations covered by the statement
- Legal requirement to publish
- Statement period and sign-off details
- Recommended topics covered by the statement
- The organisation’s sectors and turnover
- Number of years producing statements
- Policies
- Training
- Monitoring working conditions
- Modern slavery risks
- Finding indicators of modern slavery
- Demonstrating progress
Organisations covered by the statement
The Shropshire Group modern slavery statement for 2022 is a group statement covering 12 organisations. See the full list of organisations covered by this statement
Legal requirement to publish
The Shropshire Group has confirmed it is required to publish a 2022 statement by law.
Statement period and sign-off details
The statement covers the following period:
9 May 2021 to 7 May 2022
The statement was signed off by:
John Shropshire (Executive Chairman)
It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
2 November 2022
Recommended topics covered by the statement
Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of topics in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended topics in the statutory guidance.
We asked the organisation to tell us which topics its statement covers.
| Topics recommended by government guidance | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains | Covered |
| Policies | Covered |
| Risk assessment | Covered |
| Due diligence (steps to address risk) | Covered |
| Training about modern slavery | Covered |
| Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time | Covered |
The organisation’s sectors and turnover
Sectors
The organisation operates in the following sectors:
- Food and beverages, agriculture and fishing
Turnover
Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:
Over £500 million
What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?
Number of years producing statements
How does this work for group statements?
Policies (optional)
| Policy provisions we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Freedom of workers to terminate employment | Included |
| Freedom of movement | Included |
| Freedom of association | Included |
| Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation | Included |
| Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees | Included |
| Prohibits compulsory overtime | Included |
| Prohibits child labour | Included |
| Prohibits discrimination | Included |
| Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents | Included |
| Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery | Included |
| Other |
Not included
|
Training (optional)
What counts as training?
| We asked who the training was for | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Your whole organisation | No |
| Your front line staff | Yes |
| Human resources | Yes |
| Executive-level staff | Yes |
| Procurement staff | Yes |
| Your suppliers | No |
| The wider community | No |
| Other |
No
|
Monitoring working conditions (optional)
Engaging with others
| We asked who the organisation engaged with | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Your suppliers | Yes |
| Trade unions or worker representative groups | Yes |
| Civil society organisations | Yes |
| Professional auditors | Yes |
| Workers within your organisation | Yes |
| Workers within your supply chain | Yes |
| Central or local government | Yes |
| Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates | Yes |
| Businesses in your industry or sector | Yes |
Social audits
What are social audits?
| Social audits we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Audit conducted by your staff | Yes |
| Third party audit arranged by your organisation | Yes |
| Audit conducted by your supplier’s staff | Yes |
| Third party audit arranged by your supplier | Yes |
| Announced audit | Yes |
| Unannounced audit | Yes |
Grievance mechanisms
| We asked if workers could raise concerns this way | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app | Yes |
| Through trade unions or other worker representative groups | Yes |
Other ways of monitoring working conditions
Modern slavery risks (optional)
Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur | Organisation’s response: Within your own operations. |
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country | Organisation’s response: United Kingdom |
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Detailed monitoring of systems of scheme operators. Ongoing interview of workers, utilising independent translators. Coordination with multi-stakeholder industry groups and law enforcement. |
Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur | Organisation’s response: Within your own operations. |
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country |
Organisation’s response:
|
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Extensive training among those in contact with recruitment process. Development of recruitment mapping tools focused on interview, including fee and cost mapping tools. |
Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur | Organisation’s response: Within your own operations. |
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country |
Organisation’s response:
|
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Extension of audit and risk assessment to agencies in those contexts. Regular sample and interview of workers with independent interpreter. Contribution to industry groups elevating standards across industry in Poland and Spain. |
Indicators of forced labour (optional)
What are ILO indicators of forced labour?
| ILO indicators we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Abuse of vulnerability | Yes |
| Deception | Yes |
| Restriction of movement | Yes |
| Isolation | Yes |
| Physical and sexual violence | Yes |
| Intimidation and threats | Yes |
| Retention of identity documents | Yes |
| Withholding of wages | Yes |
| Debt bondage | Yes |
| Abusive working and living conditions | No |
| Excessive overtime | No |
| Other |
-
|
Actions taken in response to finding ILO indicators
| Actions we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Financial remediation, including repayment of recruitment fees | No |
| Change in policy | Yes |
| Change in training | Yes |
| Referring potential victims to government services | Yes |
| Supporting victims via NGO | Yes |
| Supporting investigations by relevant authorities | Yes |
| Other |
-
|