TENON FM LIMITED modern slavery statement summary (2026)

Organisation address
Harman House, Ground Floor,
1 George Street,
Uxbridge,
England,
UB8 1QQ

We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.

This statement provides information for 5 of 6 recommended topics

What is a modern slavery statement?
UK law requires certain organisations to publish an annual modern slavery statement on their website, setting out the steps they are taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read more in the government guidance on publishing modern slavery statements.
Link to full statement
Go to full modern slavery statement on organisation’s website

PDF version of the statement

Warning The file has been uploaded directly by TENON FM LIMITED and has not been reviewed, assessed or moderated by the Home Office for suitability and accessibility.
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact TENON FM LIMITED for further assistance.
Download

HRP 30 - Modern_Slavery_and_Human_Trafficking_Statement_2026.pdf

File uploaded: 01 September 2026 at 1:19pm
PDF | 414.05 KB

Download file

About this statement summary

All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.

Contents

Statement period and sign-off details

The statement covers the following period:
1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

The statement was signed off by:
Anuj Chopra (HR Director)

It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
24 August 2026

Recommended topics covered by the statement

Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of topics in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended topics in the statutory guidance.

We asked the organisation to tell us which topics its statement covers.

Topics recommended by government guidance Organisation’s response
The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains Covered
Policies Covered
Risk assessment Covered
Due diligence (steps to address risk) Covered
Training about modern slavery Not covered
Targeted modern slavery training is a 2026/27 priority, including awareness for new starters, managers and relevant support functions.
Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time Covered

The organisation’s sectors and turnover

Sectors

The organisation operates in the following sectors:

  • Cleaning and security services

Turnover

Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:

£36 million to £60 million

If the organisation is a public body, this amount is based on the organisation’s budget for the year of the statement.
What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?
If this is a group statement, this includes the total turnover for all the organisations covered by the statement.

Number of years producing statements

The organisation has been producing modern slavery statements for the following number of years:
More than 5 years
How does this work for group statements?
If the statement is for a group of organisations, this answer applies to the organisation with the longest history of producing statements.

Policies (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its policies include the following provisions in relation to its domestic and international supply chains, as well as its own operations.
Policy provisions we asked about Organisation’s response
Freedom of workers to terminate employment Not included
Freedom of movement Included
Freedom of association Not included
Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation Included
Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees Included
Prohibits compulsory overtime Not included
Prohibits child labour Included
Prohibits discrimination Included
Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents Included
Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery Not included
Other
Not included

Training (optional)

We asked the organisation whether it provided training on modern slavery, and who it was for.
What counts as training?
We explained that by ‘training’ we meant anything designed to increase knowledge and skills around identifying, addressing or preventing modern slavery risks. This could range from formal training courses to broader awareness-raising activities such as workshops or webinars.
Organisation’s response
The organisation told us it did not did not provide training on modern slavery during the period of the statement.

Monitoring working conditions (optional)

Engaging with others

We asked the organisation to tell us who it engaged with to help monitor working conditions across its operations and supply chains.
We asked who the organisation engaged with Organisation’s response
Your suppliers Yes
Trade unions or worker representative groups No
Civil society organisations No
Professional auditors No
Workers within your organisation Yes
Workers within your supply chain No
Central or local government No
Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates No
Businesses in your industry or sector No

Social audits

We asked the organisation to tell us about any social audits it used to look for signs of modern slavery.
What are social audits?
A social audit is a review of an organisation’s working practices from the point of view of social responsibility, and should include an evaluation of working conditions in the organisation’s operations and supply chains. By their nature, audits of supplier workplaces represent a snapshot in time.
Organisation’s response
The organisation told us it did not carry out any social audits during the period of the statement.

Grievance mechanisms

We asked the organisation how workers in its operations or supply chains could raise concerns or make complaints.
We asked if workers could raise concerns this way Organisation’s response
Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app Yes
Through trade unions or other worker representative groups No

Other ways of monitoring working conditions

We asked the organisation whether it had any other ways of monitoring working conditions across its operations and supply chains:
HR and Payroll monitored workforce, pay, attendance and identity anomalies, alongside supplier due diligence and ongoing review of labour, subcontracting and emerging risks.

Modern slavery risks (optional)

Warning Identifying modern slavery risks is a vital step towards eradicating it. The government encourages organisations to be as open and transparent as possible, to improve understanding, collaboration and best practice around tackling this worldwide problem.
We asked the organisation to describe up to 3 priority risks it focused on during the period of the statement, including details of the affected workers, the activity involved, and the location.

Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)

Agency and subcontract workers in UK FM services may face risk from opaque recruitment, fees or third-party control. We use labour-provider assurance, workforce checks and escalation controls.
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains.
  • Tier 1 suppliers
    Provide their products and services directly to your organisation.
  • Tier 2 suppliers
    Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 1 suppliers.
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Migrants
  • Low-paid, temporary and agency workers who may be vulnerable to financial pressure, language barriers or dependency on labour intermediaries.
In which country Organisation’s response: United Kingdom
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: We apply proportionate due diligence to labour providers and subcontractors, including review of recruitment and labour practices, subcontracting arrangements and modern slavery controls. Agency and third-party labour are subject to equivalent assurance expectations. We monitor workforce, identity and pay anomalies, challenge unexplained labour arrangements and escalate concerns. Enhanced checks, corrective action, suspension or termination may be used where risks are identified.

Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)

Low-paid and migrant workers in UK FM may be more vulnerable due to financial pressure, language barriers or immigration dependency. HR and Payroll monitor identity, pay and worker-data anomalies.
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your own operations.
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Migrants
  • Low-paid workers who may be vulnerable due to financial pressure, language barriers or dependency on others.
In which country Organisation’s response: United Kingdom
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: We operate direct recruitment and right-to-work controls and do not tolerate worker-paid recruitment fees or retention of identity documents. HR and Payroll monitor pay, bank, identity, attendance and worker-data anomalies that may indicate exploitation. Employees can raise concerns through management, HR and whistleblowing routes. Potential indicators are investigated and escalated, with safeguarding and external referral where appropriate.

Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)

Multi-tier subcontracting in UK FM can reduce visibility of who employs and controls workers. We use supplier due diligence, risk-based reviews and challenge unexplained labour arrangements.
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains.
  • Tier 1 suppliers
    Provide their products and services directly to your organisation.
  • Tier 2 suppliers
    Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 1 suppliers.
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Migrants
  • Low-paid, temporary and subcontract workers who may have limited visibility over or control of their employment arrangements.
In which country Organisation’s response: United Kingdom
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: We use risk-based supplier due diligence covering labour models, subcontracting and modern slavery controls. Suppliers may be required to provide further evidence and explain labour arrangements. Higher-risk concerns can trigger enhanced review, corrective action, suspension or termination. For 2026/27 we are strengthening supplier risk tiering and visibility of significant subcontracting and labour-provider tiers.

Indicators of forced labour (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its statement refers to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.
What are ILO indicators of forced labour?
The International Labour Organization (ILO) has produced a list of the most common signs of forced labour. They’re based on the definition of forced labour as ‘all work or service which is extracted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.’ More details and guidance are available on the ILO website, and in their publication ILO indicators of forced labour
ILO indicators we asked about Organisation’s response
Abuse of vulnerability Yes
Deception No
Restriction of movement Yes
Isolation No
Physical and sexual violence No
Intimidation and threats Yes
Retention of identity documents Yes
Withholding of wages Yes
Debt bondage Yes
Abusive working and living conditions Yes
Excessive overtime Yes
Other
-

Actions taken in response to finding ILO indicators

We asked the organisation to tell us whether its statement refers to any actions it took after finding indicators of forced labour
Organisation’s response
The organisation told us its statement does not refer to actions it took after finding indicators of forced labour.

Demonstrating progress (optional)

We asked the organisation how its statement demonstrates progress over time in addressing modern slavery risks. They provided the following answer:
We monitor supplier due diligence, higher-risk reviews, right-to-work compliance, concerns, corrective actions and workforce data anomalies. For 2026/27 we have set priorities to strengthen supplier risk tiering and supply-chain visibility, formalise effectiveness metrics, improve contractual controls and labour-provider assurance, and introduce targeted modern slavery training.