Monjasa A/S modern slavery statement summary (2026)

Organisation address
Strevelinsvej 34,
Fredericia,
Denmark,
7000

We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.

This statement provides information for all 6 recommended topics

What is a modern slavery statement?
UK law requires certain organisations to publish an annual modern slavery statement on their website, setting out the steps they are taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read more in the government guidance on publishing modern slavery statements.
Link to full statement
Go to full modern slavery statement on organisation’s website

PDF version of the statement

Warning The file has been uploaded directly by Monjasa A/S and has not been reviewed, assessed or moderated by the Home Office for suitability and accessibility.
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact Monjasa A/S for further assistance.
Download

Modern Slavery Statement 2026.pdf

File uploaded: 07 July 2026 at 6:25am
PDF | 192.88 KB

Download file

About this statement summary

All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.

Contents

Statement period and sign-off details

The statement covers the following period:
1 January 2025 to 31 December 2025

The statement was signed off by:
Jesper Nielsen (Responsibility Director )

It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
2 July 2026

Recommended topics covered by the statement

Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of topics in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended topics in the statutory guidance.

We asked the organisation to tell us which topics its statement covers.

Topics recommended by government guidance Organisation’s response
The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains Covered
Policies Covered
Risk assessment Covered
Due diligence (steps to address risk) Covered
Training about modern slavery Covered
Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time Covered

The organisation’s sectors and turnover

Sectors

The organisation operates in the following sectors:

  • Mining, metals, chemicals and resources (including oil and gas)
  • Offshore wind logistics services

Turnover

Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:

Over £500 million

If the organisation is a public body, this amount is based on the organisation’s budget for the year of the statement.
What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?
If this is a group statement, this includes the total turnover for all the organisations covered by the statement.

Number of years producing statements

The organisation has been producing modern slavery statements for the following number of years:
1 to 5 years
How does this work for group statements?
If the statement is for a group of organisations, this answer applies to the organisation with the longest history of producing statements.

Policies (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its policies include the following provisions in relation to its domestic and international supply chains, as well as its own operations.
Policy provisions we asked about Organisation’s response
Freedom of workers to terminate employment Included
Freedom of movement Included
Freedom of association Included
Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation Included
Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees Included
Prohibits compulsory overtime Included
Prohibits child labour Included
Prohibits discrimination Included
Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents Included
Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery Included
Other
Not included

Training (optional)

We asked the organisation whether it provided training on modern slavery, and who it was for.
What counts as training?
We explained that by ‘training’ we meant anything designed to increase knowledge and skills around identifying, addressing or preventing modern slavery risks. This could range from formal training courses to broader awareness-raising activities such as workshops or webinars.
We asked who the training was for Organisation’s response
Your whole organisation No
Your front line staff Yes
Human resources No
Executive-level staff No
Procurement staff No
Your suppliers No
The wider community No
Other
No

Monitoring working conditions (optional)

Engaging with others

We asked the organisation to tell us who it engaged with to help monitor working conditions across its operations and supply chains.
We asked who the organisation engaged with Organisation’s response
Your suppliers No
Trade unions or worker representative groups No
Civil society organisations No
Professional auditors No
Workers within your organisation Yes
Workers within your supply chain Yes
Central or local government No
Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates No
Businesses in your industry or sector No

Social audits

We asked the organisation to tell us about any social audits it used to look for signs of modern slavery.
What are social audits?
A social audit is a review of an organisation’s working practices from the point of view of social responsibility, and should include an evaluation of working conditions in the organisation’s operations and supply chains. By their nature, audits of supplier workplaces represent a snapshot in time.
Social audits we asked about Organisation’s response
Audit conducted by your staff Yes
Third party audit arranged by your organisation No
Audit conducted by your supplier’s staff No
Third party audit arranged by your supplier No
Announced audit No
Unannounced audit No

Grievance mechanisms

We asked the organisation how workers in its operations or supply chains could raise concerns or make complaints.
We asked if workers could raise concerns this way Organisation’s response
Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app Yes
Through trade unions or other worker representative groups No

Other ways of monitoring working conditions

We asked the organisation whether it had any other ways of monitoring working conditions across its operations and supply chains:
Monjasa monitored working conditions via supplier screening, vessel audits, a whistleblowing platform, the HSEQ app, and ISO-certified systems.

Modern slavery risks (optional)

Warning Identifying modern slavery risks is a vital step towards eradicating it. The government encourages organisations to be as open and transparent as possible, to improve understanding, collaboration and best practice around tackling this worldwide problem.
We asked the organisation to describe up to 3 priority risks it focused on during the period of the statement, including details of the affected workers, the activity involved, and the location.

Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)

Vessel Operations Crew on owned vessels face medium risk due to flag state limits and no ITF coverage.
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your own operations.
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Crew from based in countries with high prevalence of Modern Slavery
In which country Organisation’s response:
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Georgia
  • India
  • Lithuania
  • Philippines
  • Russia
  • Ukraine
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: Monjasa mitigates owned fleet risk through internal crew contracts, MLC compliance and onboard grievance mechanisms via the DPA and whistleblowing platform. HSEQ audits now include modern slavery checkpoints. Crew awareness e-learning is being integrated into Montec onboarding. ITF coverage gaps are being assessed, with two European vessels now covered by ITF agreements and one by national requirements.

Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)

Supply Chain Supplier vessel crew present high inherent risk due to unknown working conditions and absent human rights policies. Key customers in high-risk jurisdictions also rated high risk.
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains.
  • Tier 1 suppliers
    Provide their products and services directly to your organisation.
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Crew working for chartered vessels under Flags that are not MLC ratified
In which country Organisation’s response: Panama
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: Monjasa embeds modern slavery checks into HSEQ vessel audits and applies risk criteria at chartering stage. Top suppliers and customers are screened, with high-risk counterparties engaged via the Code of Conduct. Targeted training was delivered to frontline staff with operational exposure, with e-learning being integrated into crew onboarding. Governance is underpinned by a board-approved Modern Slavery Statement, Human Rights Risk Register, Working Group, and open whistleblowing platform.

Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)

Office staff in conflict-affected regions and high-corruption countries such face medium risk. Third-party service workers carry similar risk where labour protections remain unclear.
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your own operations.
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Workers working in countries with high prevalence of Modern Slavery and near conflict zones .
In which country Organisation’s response: United Arab Emirates
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: Monjasa uses direct contracts where possible, monitors legal compliance, and implements ISO 45001-aligned health and safety systems. A formal flexible working policy is being introduced for staff in conflict-affected offices, with whistleblowing awareness checks embedded into office audits.

Indicators of forced labour (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its statement refers to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.
What are ILO indicators of forced labour?
The International Labour Organization (ILO) has produced a list of the most common signs of forced labour. They’re based on the definition of forced labour as ‘all work or service which is extracted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.’ More details and guidance are available on the ILO website, and in their publication ILO indicators of forced labour
ILO indicators we asked about Organisation’s response
Abuse of vulnerability No
Deception No
Restriction of movement Yes
Isolation Yes
Physical and sexual violence No
Intimidation and threats Yes
Retention of identity documents Yes
Withholding of wages Yes
Debt bondage Yes
Abusive working and living conditions Yes
Excessive overtime Yes
Other
-

Actions taken in response to finding ILO indicators

We asked the organisation to tell us whether its statement refers to any actions it took after finding indicators of forced labour
Organisation’s response
The organisation told us its statement does not refer to actions it took after finding indicators of forced labour.

Demonstrating progress (optional)

We asked the organisation how its statement demonstrates progress over time in addressing modern slavery risks. They provided the following answer:
Monjasa tracks effectiveness through the following annual KPIs: Employees in specialist roles trained in modern slavery risk identification Audits conducted onboard owned and chartered vessels incorporating modern slavery criteria Sourcing and back-to-back suppliers screened for modern slavery risks Third-party vessels evaluated for modern slavery risks through compliance screening