AIRBUS OPERATIONS LIMITED modern slavery statement summary (2023)

Organisation address

Pegasus House Aerospace Avenue,
Filton,
Bristol,
BS34 7PA

We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.

This statement provides information for all 6 recommended areas

What is a modern slavery statement?

UK law requires certain organisations to publish an annual modern slavery statement on their website, setting out the steps they are taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read more in the government guidance on publishing modern slavery statements.

Link to full statement

Go to full modern slavery statement on organisation’s website

PDF version of the statement

Warning The file has been uploaded directly by AIRBUS OPERATIONS LIMITED and has not been reviewed, assessed or moderated by the Home Office for suitability and accessibility.
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact AIRBUS OPERATIONS LIMITED for further assistance.

Airbus SE Modern Slavery Statement 2022 (1).pdf

File uploaded: 02 July 2024 at 6:05am
PDF | 1.23 MB

Download file

About this statement summary

All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.

Contents

Organisations covered by the statement
Legal requirement to publish
Statement period and sign-off details
Recommended areas covered by the statement
The organisation’s sectors and turnover
Number of years producing statements
Policies
Training
Monitoring working conditions
Modern slavery risks
Finding indicators of modern slavery
Demonstrating progress

Organisations covered by the statement

AIRBUS OPERATIONS LIMITED modern slavery statement for 2023 is a group statement covering 4 organisations. See the full list of organisations covered by this statement

Legal requirement to publish

AIRBUS OPERATIONS LIMITED has confirmed it is required to publish a 2023 statement by law.

Statement period and sign-off details

The statement covers the following period:
1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022

The statement was signed off by:
Guillaume Faury (CEO)

It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
3 May 2023

Recommended areas covered by the statement

Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of areas in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended areas in the statutory guidance.

We asked the organisation to tell us which areas its statement covers.

Areas recommended by government guidance	Organisation’s response
The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains	Covered
Policies	Covered
Risk assessment	Covered
Due diligence (steps to address risk)	Covered
Training about modern slavery	Covered
Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time	Covered

The organisation’s sectors and turnover

Sectors

The organisation operates in the following sectors:

Transportation, logistics, and storage

Turnover

Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:

Over £500 million

If the organisation is a public body, this amount is based on the organisation’s budget for the year of the statement.

What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?

If this is a group statement, this includes the total turnover for all the organisations covered by the statement.

Number of years producing statements

The organisation has been producing modern slavery statements for the following number of years:

More than 5 years

How does this work for group statements?

If the statement is for a group of organisations, this answer applies to the organisation with the longest history of producing statements.

Policies (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its policies include the following provisions in relation to its domestic and international supply chains, as well as its own operations.

Policy provisions we asked about	Organisation’s response
Freedom of workers to terminate employment	Included
Freedom of movement	Included
Freedom of association	Included
Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation	Included
Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees	Included
Prohibits compulsory overtime	Included
Prohibits child labour	Included
Prohibits discrimination	Included
Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents	Included
Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery	Included
Other	Not included

Training (optional)

We asked the organisation whether it provided training on modern slavery, and who it was for.

What counts as training?

We explained that by ‘training’ we meant anything designed to increase knowledge and skills around identifying, addressing or preventing modern slavery risks. This could range from formal training courses to broader awareness-raising activities such as workshops or webinars.

We asked who the training was for	Organisation’s response
Your whole organisation	Yes
Your front line staff	Yes
Human resources	No
Executive-level staff	Yes
Procurement staff	Yes
Your suppliers	Yes
The wider community	No
Other	No

Monitoring working conditions (optional)

Engaging with others

We asked the organisation to tell us who it engaged with to help monitor working conditions across its operations and supply chains.

We asked who the organisation engaged with	Organisation’s response
Your suppliers	Yes
Trade unions or worker representative groups	No
Civil society organisations	Yes
Professional auditors	Yes
Workers within your organisation	No
Workers within your supply chain	Yes
Central or local government	No
Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates	No
Businesses in your industry or sector	Yes

Social audits

We asked the organisation to tell us about any social audits it used to look for signs of modern slavery.

What are social audits?

A social audit is a review of an organisation’s working practices from the point of view of social responsibility, and should include an evaluation of working conditions in the organisation’s operations and supply chains. By their nature, audits of supplier workplaces represent a snapshot in time.

Social audits we asked about	Organisation’s response
Audit conducted by your staff	No
Third party audit arranged by your organisation	Yes
Audit conducted by your supplier’s staff	No
Third party audit arranged by your supplier	No
Announced audit	Yes
Unannounced audit	No

Grievance mechanisms

We asked the organisation how workers in its operations or supply chains could raise concerns or make complaints.

We asked if workers could raise concerns this way	Organisation’s response
Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app	Yes
Through trade unions or other worker representative groups	Yes

Other ways of monitoring working conditions

We asked the organisation whether it had any other ways of monitoring working conditions across its operations and supply chains:

Organisation’s response

The organisation did not answer this question.

Modern slavery risks (optional)

Warning Identifying modern slavery risks is a vital step towards eradicating it. The government encourages organisations to be as open and transparent as possible, to improve understanding, collaboration and best practice around tackling this worldwide problem.

We asked the organisation to describe up to 3 priority risks it focused on during the period of the statement, including details of the affected workers, the activity involved, and the location.

Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)

28 human rights or labour rights alerts were raised through either the supplier screening process, media /NGO reports or the Company’s OpenLine. 24 of the alerts were closed with no required actions.

Questions we asked about this risk	Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur	Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains. Tier 1 suppliers Provide their products and services directly to your organisation. Tier 2 suppliers Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 1 suppliers. Tier 3 suppliers and below Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 2 suppliers or the next higher level in the chain.
Who was it most likely to affect	Organisation’s response: Migrants
In which country	Organisation’s response: Malaysia
Actions or plans to address this risk	Organisation’s response: Continued roll out of the Company’s revised Supplier Code of Conduct, with strengthened expectations on forced and child labour as well as other human and labour rights and a requirement for suppliers to formally confirm adherence to the Supplier Code of Conduct and to cascade the principles throughout their supply chain. Strengthened supply chain due diligence including updated risk mapping (country and activity) and a review of its risk identification and alert management process.

Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)

n/a

Questions we asked about this risk	Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur	Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains. Tier 1 suppliers Provide their products and services directly to your organisation. Tier 2 suppliers Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 1 suppliers. Tier 3 suppliers and below Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 2 suppliers or the next higher level in the chain.
Who was it most likely to affect	Organisation’s response: Migrants
In which country	Organisation’s response: Malaysia
Actions or plans to address this risk	Organisation’s response: 28 alerts of concern were raised related to human rights or labour rights from within the Company’s supply chain. This increase (from four disclosed in 2021) reflects the progressing maturity of the Company’s due diligence efforts as well as increasing awareness on human rights topics. The alerts were raised through either the supplier screening process, media /NGO reports or the Company’s OpenLine. Following analysis, 24 alerts were closed with no actions; 4 remain open pending action.

Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)

n/a

Questions we asked about this risk	Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur	Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains. Tier 3 suppliers and below Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 2 suppliers or the next higher level in the chain.
Who was it most likely to affect	Organisation’s response: Refugees
In which country	Organisation’s response: Malaysia
Actions or plans to address this risk	Organisation’s response: Continued roll out of the revised Supplier Code of Conduct, with strengthened expectations on forced and child labour as well as other human and labour rights and a requirement for suppliers to formally confirm adherence to the SCoC and cascade throughout their supply chain. Additional actions: include human rights in the supplier onboarding process, strengthen supply chain due diligence incl updated risk mapping (country and activity) and a review of risk identification and alert process.

Indicators of forced labour (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its statement refers to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.

What are ILO indicators of forced labour?

The International Labour Organization (ILO) has produced a list of the most common signs of forced labour. They’re based on the definition of forced labour as ‘all work or service which is extracted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.’ More details and guidance are available on the ILO website, and in their publication ILO indicators of forced labour