FUJITSU SERVICES HOLDINGS PLC modern slavery statement summary (2026)

Organisation address
Fujitsu,
Lovelace Road,
Bracknell,
England,
RG12 8SN

We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.

This statement provides information for all 6 recommended topics

What is a modern slavery statement?
UK law requires certain organisations to publish an annual modern slavery statement on their website, setting out the steps they are taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read more in the government guidance on publishing modern slavery statements.
Link to full statement
Go to full modern slavery statement on organisation’s website

PDF version of the statement

Warning The file has been uploaded directly by FUJITSU SERVICES HOLDINGS PLC and has not been reviewed, assessed or moderated by the Home Office for suitability and accessibility.
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact FUJITSU SERVICES HOLDINGS PLC for further assistance.
Download

Fujitsu UK MSS 2026.pdf

File uploaded: 06 October 2026 at 1:52pm
PDF | 674.19 KB

Download file

About this statement summary

All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.

Contents

Statement period and sign-off details

The statement covers the following period:
1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

The statement was signed off by:
Anwen Owen (Head of Fujitsu UK)

It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
3 September 2026

Recommended topics covered by the statement

Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of topics in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended topics in the statutory guidance.

We asked the organisation to tell us which topics its statement covers.

Topics recommended by government guidance Organisation’s response
The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains Covered
Policies Covered
Risk assessment Covered
Due diligence (steps to address risk) Covered
Training about modern slavery Covered
Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time Covered

The organisation’s sectors and turnover

Sectors

The organisation operates in the following sectors:

  • Information technology and telecommunication

Turnover

Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:

Over £500 million

If the organisation is a public body, this amount is based on the organisation’s budget for the year of the statement.
What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?
If this is a group statement, this includes the total turnover for all the organisations covered by the statement.

Number of years producing statements

The organisation has been producing modern slavery statements for the following number of years:
More than 5 years
How does this work for group statements?
If the statement is for a group of organisations, this answer applies to the organisation with the longest history of producing statements.

Policies (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its policies include the following provisions in relation to its domestic and international supply chains, as well as its own operations.
Policy provisions we asked about Organisation’s response
Freedom of workers to terminate employment Included
Freedom of movement Included
Freedom of association Included
Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation Included
Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees Included
Prohibits compulsory overtime Not included
Prohibits child labour Included
Prohibits discrimination Included
Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents Included
Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery Included
Other
Prohibition of forced labour and human trafficking; supplier due diligence requirements; audit rights; corrective action plans; whistleblowing and grievance mechanisms; protection against retaliation for reporting concerns.

Training (optional)

We asked the organisation whether it provided training on modern slavery, and who it was for.
What counts as training?
We explained that by ‘training’ we meant anything designed to increase knowledge and skills around identifying, addressing or preventing modern slavery risks. This could range from formal training courses to broader awareness-raising activities such as workshops or webinars.
We asked who the training was for Organisation’s response
Your whole organisation Yes
Your front line staff No
Human resources No
Executive-level staff No
Procurement staff Yes
Your suppliers No
The wider community No
Other
Supply chain management staff and employees involved in supplier oversight and responsible sourcing activities

Monitoring working conditions (optional)

Engaging with others

We asked the organisation to tell us who it engaged with to help monitor working conditions across its operations and supply chains.
We asked who the organisation engaged with Organisation’s response
Your suppliers Yes
Trade unions or worker representative groups No
Civil society organisations No
Professional auditors No
Workers within your organisation No
Workers within your supply chain No
Central or local government No
Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates No
Businesses in your industry or sector No

Social audits

We asked the organisation to tell us about any social audits it used to look for signs of modern slavery.
What are social audits?
A social audit is a review of an organisation’s working practices from the point of view of social responsibility, and should include an evaluation of working conditions in the organisation’s operations and supply chains. By their nature, audits of supplier workplaces represent a snapshot in time.
Organisation’s response
The organisation told us it did not carry out any social audits during the period of the statement.

Grievance mechanisms

We asked the organisation how workers in its operations or supply chains could raise concerns or make complaints.
We asked if workers could raise concerns this way Organisation’s response
Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app Yes
Through trade unions or other worker representative groups Yes

Other ways of monitoring working conditions

We asked the organisation whether it had any other ways of monitoring working conditions across its operations and supply chains:
Supplier due diligence, annual risk mapping, enhanced supplier assessments, open-source research and self-assessment questionnaires for higher-risk suppliers.

Modern slavery risks (optional)

Warning Identifying modern slavery risks is a vital step towards eradicating it. The government encourages organisations to be as open and transparent as possible, to improve understanding, collaboration and best practice around tackling this worldwide problem.
We asked the organisation to describe up to 3 priority risks it focused on during the period of the statement, including details of the affected workers, the activity involved, and the location.

Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)

Suppliers operating in medium and high-risk countries where weaker labour protections may increase exposure to forced labour and worker exploitation
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains.
  • Tier 1 suppliers
    Provide their products and services directly to your organisation.
  • Tier 2 suppliers
    Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 1 suppliers.
  • Tier 3 suppliers and below
    Provide products and services to your organisation via your Tier 2 suppliers or the next higher level in the chain.
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Migrants
  • Temporary and low paid workers, agency workers, workers in countries with weaker labour protections
In which country Organisation’s response: No details provided
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: Enhanced risk assessments were conducted across approximately 500 suppliers, considering geographic, industry and business-criticality risks. Higher-risk suppliers were subject to open-source research and Self-Assessment Questionnaires, with responses reviewed by the Supply Chain Sustainability team. Suppliers are engaged on identified risks and a supplier maturity model is planned to strengthen ongoing monitoring and improvement.

Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)

Workers in higher-risk industry sectors with known exposure to forced labour and exploitative labour practices within global supply chains
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains.
  • Don't know
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Migrants
  • Temporary and low paid workers, agency workers, workers in countries with weaker labour protections
In which country Organisation’s response: No details provided
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: Suppliers were assessed using a multi-factor methodology considering industry, geographic and business-criticality risks. Higher-risk suppliers were subject to additional scrutiny through open-source research and Self-Assessment Questionnaires. Responses were reviewed by the Supply Chain Sustainability team, with ongoing engagement and a planned supplier maturity model to strengthen monitoring and continuous improvement.

Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)

Workers within critical suppliers to Fujitsu where the scale and importance of the relationship could increase potential modern slavery impacts
Questions we asked about this risk Organisation’s response
Where it was most likely to occur Organisation’s response: Within your supply chains.
  • Don't know
Who was it most likely to affect Organisation’s response:
  • Migrants
  • Temporary and low paid workers, agency workers, workers in countries with weaker labour protections
In which country Organisation’s response: No details provided
Actions or plans to address this risk Organisation’s response: Supplier criticality formed part of Fujitsu's enhanced risk assessment methodology. Strategic suppliers were assessed alongside geographic and industry risks, with higher-risk suppliers subject to additional research and Self-Assessment Questionnaires. We will continue this approach and introduce a supplier maturity model to strengthen monitoring, engagement and risk management.

Indicators of forced labour (optional)

We asked the organisation whether its statement refers to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.
What are ILO indicators of forced labour?
The International Labour Organization (ILO) has produced a list of the most common signs of forced labour. They’re based on the definition of forced labour as ‘all work or service which is extracted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.’ More details and guidance are available on the ILO website, and in their publication ILO indicators of forced labour
Organisation’s response
The organisation told us its statement does not refer to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.

Demonstrating progress (optional)

We asked the organisation how its statement demonstrates progress over time in addressing modern slavery risks. They provided the following answer:
Fujitsu measures progress through KPIs including supplier due diligence coverage, adoption of sustainable procurement requirements, training completion rates and supplier risk scores. During FY25/26, approximately 500 suppliers were assessed and 50 higher-risk suppliers received Self-Assessment Questionnaires. Future commitments include introducing a supplier maturity model and extending supplier mapping beyond Tier 1 suppliers.