GAP PERSONNEL HOLDINGS LIMITED modern slavery statement summary (2024)
Organisation address
Pulford,
Chester,
England,
CH4 9EP
We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.
This statement provides information for all 6 recommended areas
What is a modern slavery statement?
PDF version of the statement
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact GAP PERSONNEL HOLDINGS LIMITED for further assistance.
![Download](/assets/images/doc-thumbnail.png)
Modern Slavery Policy Statement V7.pdf
File uploaded: 05 July 2024 at 2:57pm
PDF
| 637.2 KB
About this statement summary
All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.
Contents
- Organisations covered by the statement
- Legal requirement to publish
- Statement period and sign-off details
- Recommended areas covered by the statement
- The organisation’s sectors and turnover
- Number of years producing statements
- Policies
- Training
- Monitoring working conditions
- Modern slavery risks
- Finding indicators of modern slavery
- Demonstrating progress
Organisations covered by the statement
GAP PERSONNEL HOLDINGS LIMITED modern slavery statement for 2024 is a group statement covering 7 organisations. See the full list of organisations covered by this statement
Legal requirement to publish
GAP PERSONNEL HOLDINGS LIMITED has confirmed it is required to publish a 2024 statement by law.
Statement period and sign-off details
The statement covers the following period:
1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024
The statement was signed off by:
Mark Roberts (Managing Director)
It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
1 July 2024
Recommended areas covered by the statement
Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of areas in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended areas in the statutory guidance.
We asked the organisation to tell us which areas its statement covers.
Areas recommended by government guidance | Organisation’s response |
---|---|
The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains | Covered |
Policies | Covered |
Risk assessment | Covered |
Due diligence (steps to address risk) | Covered |
Training about modern slavery | Covered |
Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time | Covered |
The organisation’s sectors and turnover
Sectors
The organisation operates in the following sectors:
- Automotive, machinery and heavy electrical equipment
- Construction, civil engineering and building products
- Consumer services, including accommodation, hospitality, tourism and leisure
- Cosmetics and toiletries
- Durable consumer goods, including electronics and appliances, home furnishings and other accessories
- Fashion, textiles, apparel and luxury goods
- Food and beverages, agriculture and fishing
- Forestry, timber products, paper and containers and packaging
- Healthcare and pharmaceuticals
- Information technology and telecommunication
- Professional and administrative services and supplies, including legal, consulting and accounting services
- Transportation, logistics, and storage
- Waste management and recycling
Turnover
Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:
£100 million to £500 million
What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?
Number of years producing statements
How does this work for group statements?
Policies (optional)
Policy provisions we asked about | Organisation’s response |
---|---|
Freedom of workers to terminate employment | Included |
Freedom of movement | Included |
Freedom of association | Included |
Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation | Included |
Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees | Included |
Prohibits compulsory overtime | Included |
Prohibits child labour | Included |
Prohibits discrimination | Included |
Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents | Included |
Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery | Included |
Other |
Not included
|
Training (optional)
What counts as training?
We asked who the training was for | Organisation’s response |
---|---|
Your whole organisation | Yes |
Your front line staff | No |
Human resources | No |
Executive-level staff | No |
Procurement staff | No |
Your suppliers | Yes |
The wider community | Yes |
Other |
No
|
Monitoring working conditions (optional)
Engaging with others
We asked who the organisation engaged with | Organisation’s response |
---|---|
Your suppliers | Yes |
Trade unions or worker representative groups | No |
Civil society organisations | No |
Professional auditors | Yes |
Workers within your organisation | Yes |
Workers within your supply chain | Yes |
Central or local government | No |
Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates | Yes |
Businesses in your industry or sector | No |
Social audits
What are social audits?
Social audits we asked about | Organisation’s response |
---|---|
Audit conducted by your staff | Yes |
Third party audit arranged by your organisation | Yes |
Audit conducted by your supplier’s staff | No |
Third party audit arranged by your supplier | No |
Announced audit | Yes |
Unannounced audit | Yes |
Grievance mechanisms
We asked if workers could raise concerns this way | Organisation’s response |
---|---|
Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app | Yes |
Through trade unions or other worker representative groups | No |
Other ways of monitoring working conditions
Modern slavery risks (optional)
Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)
Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
---|---|
Where it was most likely to occur | Organisation’s response: Within your own operations. |
Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
In which country | Organisation’s response: United Kingdom |
Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: For sponsored healthcare workers we have strengthened our process for completing right to work checks on all new applicants to include conducting an active check on the gov.uk website on the company listed on their certificate of sponsorship, to verify they are a legitimate and active sponsor prior to the approval of their right to work in the UK. We also conduct checks on the sponsors of all live workers on a monthly basis to verify that they are still listed as an ‘active’ sponsor on gov.uk. |
Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)
Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
---|---|
Where it was most likely to occur | Organisation’s response: Within your own operations. |
Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
In which country | Organisation’s response: United Kingdom |
Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Investment of half a million GBP into the development and roll out of our new Candidate Registration System (CRS) which will incorporate features such as IDSP certified technology, facial recognition technology, bank validation, automation of common details checks and dynamic interview questioning in relation to Stronger Together and the identification of potential modern slavery victims, illegal workers and imposters during the onboarding process. |
Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)
Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
---|---|
Where it was most likely to occur | Organisation’s response: Within your own operations. |
Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
In which country | Organisation’s response: United Kingdom |
Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Implementation of communication to applicants and workers regarding the “Just Good Work” app which seeks to provide individuals in their own language critical information about working and their rights in the UK. |