MOTOR DEPOT LIMITED modern slavery statement summary (2026)
Organisation address
Priory Park,
Hessle,
East Yorkshire,
England,
HU13 9PG
We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.
This statement provides information for all 6 recommended topics
What is a modern slavery statement?
PDF version of the statement
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact MOTOR DEPOT LIMITED for further assistance.
MODERN SLAVERY STATEMENT March 2026 .pdf
File uploaded: 25 March 2026 at 8:32am
PDF
| 294.92 KB
About this statement summary
All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.
Contents
- Legal requirement to publish
- Statement period and sign-off details
- Recommended topics covered by the statement
- The organisation’s sectors and turnover
- Number of years producing statements
- Policies
- Training
- Monitoring working conditions
- Modern slavery risks
- Finding indicators of modern slavery
- Demonstrating progress
Legal requirement to publish
MOTOR DEPOT LIMITED has confirmed it is required to publish a 2026 statement by law.
Statement period and sign-off details
The statement covers the following period:
1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025
The statement was signed off by:
Matt Barrick (CEO)
It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
23 March 2026
Recommended topics covered by the statement
Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of topics in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended topics in the statutory guidance.
We asked the organisation to tell us which topics its statement covers.
| Topics recommended by government guidance | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains | Covered |
| Policies | Covered |
| Risk assessment | Covered |
| Due diligence (steps to address risk) | Covered |
| Training about modern slavery | Covered |
| Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time | Covered |
The organisation’s sectors and turnover
Sectors
The organisation operates in the following sectors:
- Automotive, machinery and heavy electrical equipment
Turnover
Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:
£100 million to £500 million
What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?
Number of years producing statements
How does this work for group statements?
Policies (optional)
| Policy provisions we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Freedom of workers to terminate employment | Included |
| Freedom of movement | Included |
| Freedom of association | Not included |
| Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation | Included |
| Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees | Included |
| Prohibits compulsory overtime | Not included |
| Prohibits child labour | Not included |
| Prohibits discrimination | Not included |
| Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents | Not included |
| Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery | Not included |
| Other |
Debt bondage
|
Training (optional)
What counts as training?
| We asked who the training was for | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Your whole organisation | Yes |
| Your front line staff | No |
| Human resources | No |
| Executive-level staff | No |
| Procurement staff | No |
| Your suppliers | No |
| The wider community | No |
| Other |
No
|
Monitoring working conditions (optional)
Engaging with others
| We asked who the organisation engaged with | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Your suppliers | Yes |
| Trade unions or worker representative groups | No |
| Civil society organisations | No |
| Professional auditors | No |
| Workers within your organisation | Yes |
| Workers within your supply chain | No |
| Central or local government | No |
| Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates | No |
| Businesses in your industry or sector | Yes |
Social audits
What are social audits?
| Social audits we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Audit conducted by your staff | Yes |
| Third party audit arranged by your organisation | No |
| Audit conducted by your supplier’s staff | No |
| Third party audit arranged by your supplier | No |
| Announced audit | No |
| Unannounced audit | No |
Grievance mechanisms
| We asked if workers could raise concerns this way | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app | Yes |
| Through trade unions or other worker representative groups | No |
Other ways of monitoring working conditions
Modern slavery risks (optional)
Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur |
Organisation’s response:
Within your supply chains.
|
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country | Organisation’s response: No details provided |
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Actions taken FY2025: Brought 66% of valeting services in-house (direct employment vs 40% previously),Conduct regular assessments of remaining 2 external contractors. Plans for FY2026: Accommodation inspections for contractor provided housing; unannounced site visits; worker interviews; payslip audits to verify no illegal deductions; target 70% in-house provision. |
Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur |
Organisation’s response:
Within your supply chains.
|
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country | Organisation’s response: No details provided |
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Assessed all 10 providers 100% above NMW. We have a worker voice mechanisim with our Aramis Group Integrity Hotline (24/7, confidential, multilingual) www.aramisgroupspeakup.com |
Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur |
Organisation’s response:
Within your supply chains.
|
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country | Organisation’s response: No details provided |
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Risk categorised 100% of Tier 1 suppliers (80+ parts suppliers). Enhanced engagement with main parts supplier. |