JD SPORTS FASHION PLC modern slavery statement summary (2026)
Organisation address
Hollinsbrook Way,
Pilsworth,
Bury,
Lancashire,
BL9 8RR
Pilsworth,
Bury,
Lancashire,
BL9 8RR
We asked the organisation a series of questions about its modern slavery statement. Its answers are published on this page as a statement summary.
This statement provides information for all 6 recommended topics
What is a modern slavery statement?
UK law requires certain organisations to publish an annual modern slavery statement on their website, setting out the steps they are taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains.
Read more in the government guidance on publishing modern slavery statements.
Link to full statement
Go to full modern slavery statement on organisation’s website
PDF version of the statement
Warning
The file has been uploaded directly by JD SPORTS FASHION PLC and has not been reviewed, assessed or moderated by the Home Office for suitability and accessibility.
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact JD SPORTS FASHION PLC for further assistance.
If you need an accessible version of this PDF file, please contact JD SPORTS FASHION PLC for further assistance.
About this statement summary
All answers relate to the financial year covered by the statement. The organisation is responsible for all the information it provided. Some of our questions are optional, so organisations may not have answered all of them. The statement summary does not replace the full modern slavery statement – below we provide a link to the full statement on the organisation’s website.
Contents
- Organisations covered by the statement
- Legal requirement to publish
- Statement period and sign-off details
- Recommended topics covered by the statement
- The organisation’s sectors and turnover
- Number of years producing statements
- Policies
- Training
- Monitoring working conditions
- Modern slavery risks
- Finding indicators of modern slavery
- Demonstrating progress
Organisations covered by the statement
JD SPORTS FASHION PLC modern slavery statement for 2026 is a group statement covering 14 organisations. See the full list of organisations covered by this statement
Legal requirement to publish
JD SPORTS FASHION PLC has confirmed it is required to publish a 2026 statement by law.
Statement period and sign-off details
The statement covers the following period:
1 February 2025 to 31 January 2026
The statement was signed off by:
Regis Shultz (CEO)
It was approved by the board (or equivalent management body) on:
28 July 2026
Recommended topics covered by the statement
Government guidance encourages organisations to cover a range of topics in their modern slavery statements, setting out the steps they’re taking to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. Read about the recommended topics in the statutory guidance.
We asked the organisation to tell us which topics its statement covers.
| Topics recommended by government guidance | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| The organisation’s structure, business and supply chains | Covered |
| Policies | Covered |
| Risk assessment | Covered |
| Due diligence (steps to address risk) | Covered |
| Training about modern slavery | Covered |
| Goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the organisation's actions and progress over time | Covered |
The organisation’s sectors and turnover
Sectors
The organisation operates in the following sectors:
- Fashion, textiles, apparel and luxury goods
Turnover
Its turnover in the financial accounting year of this statement was:
Over £500 million
If the organisation is a public body, this amount is based on the organisation’s budget for the year of the statement.
What does 'turnover' refer to in group statements?
If this is a group statement, this includes the total turnover for all the organisations covered by the statement.
Number of years producing statements
The organisation has been producing modern slavery statements for the following number of years:
More than 5 years
How does this work for group statements?
If the statement is for a group of organisations, this answer applies to the organisation with the longest history of producing statements.
Policies (optional)
We asked the organisation whether its policies include the following provisions in relation to its domestic and international supply chains, as well as its own operations.
| Policy provisions we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Freedom of workers to terminate employment | Included |
| Freedom of movement | Included |
| Freedom of association | Included |
| Prohibits any threat of violence, harassment and intimidation | Included |
| Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees | Included |
| Prohibits compulsory overtime | Included |
| Prohibits child labour | Included |
| Prohibits discrimination | Included |
| Prohibits confiscation of workers' original identification documents | Included |
| Provides access to remedy, compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery | Not included |
| Other |
Not included
|
Training (optional)
We asked the organisation whether it provided training on modern slavery, and who it was for.
What counts as training?
We explained that by ‘training’ we meant anything designed to increase knowledge and skills around identifying, addressing or preventing modern slavery risks.
This could range from formal training courses to broader awareness-raising activities such as workshops or webinars.
| We asked who the training was for | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Your whole organisation | Yes |
| Your front line staff | Yes |
| Human resources | Yes |
| Executive-level staff | Yes |
| Procurement staff | Yes |
| Your suppliers | No |
| The wider community | No |
| Other |
No
|
Monitoring working conditions (optional)
Engaging with others
We asked the organisation to tell us who it engaged with to help monitor working conditions across its operations and supply chains.
| We asked who the organisation engaged with | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Your suppliers | Yes |
| Trade unions or worker representative groups | No |
| Civil society organisations | No |
| Professional auditors | Yes |
| Workers within your organisation | Yes |
| Workers within your supply chain | No |
| Central or local government | No |
| Law enforcement, such as police, GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates | Yes |
| Businesses in your industry or sector | Yes |
Social audits
We asked the organisation to tell us about any social audits it used to look for signs of modern slavery.
What are social audits?
A social audit is a review of an organisation’s working practices from the point of view of social responsibility, and should include an evaluation of working conditions in the organisation’s operations and supply chains.
By their nature, audits of supplier workplaces represent a snapshot in time.
| Social audits we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Audit conducted by your staff | Yes |
| Third party audit arranged by your organisation | Yes |
| Audit conducted by your supplier’s staff | No |
| Third party audit arranged by your supplier | Yes |
| Announced audit | Yes |
| Unannounced audit | No |
Grievance mechanisms
We asked the organisation how workers in its operations or supply chains could raise concerns or make complaints.
| We asked if workers could raise concerns this way | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Using anonymous whistleblowing services, such as a helpline or mobile phone app | Yes |
| Through trade unions or other worker representative groups | Yes |
Other ways of monitoring working conditions
We asked the organisation whether it had any other ways of monitoring working conditions across its operations and supply chains:
Supply chain traceability mapping & in-country visits. In our UK operations, welfare champions, & confidential reporting mechanisms provide oversight of potential indicators of exploitation.
Modern slavery risks (optional)
Warning
Identifying modern slavery risks is a vital step towards eradicating it.
The government encourages organisations to be as open and transparent as possible, to improve understanding, collaboration and best practice around tackling this worldwide problem.
We asked the organisation to describe up to 3 priority risks it focused on during the period of the statement, including details of the affected workers, the activity involved, and the location.
Priority risks for this organisation (1 of 3)
Forced labour risks in global manufacturing supply chains, particularly relating to recruitment practices, wage payments, social insurance, overtime & documentation in high-risk sourcing regions.
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur |
Organisation’s response:
Within your supply chains.
|
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country |
Organisation’s response:
|
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Prior to onboarding any Tier 1 supplier, risk assessments & audits must be in place along with CAP reports. Transparancy of the value chain and supplier engagment beyond common risk is on key areas : Freedom of Association / Living wages/Benefits to ensure a valued workforce. Working in partnership with suppliers and identifying root causes is key to engagment and progress. Suppliers should be long term partners and shared values embedded in the relationship. |
Priority risks for this organisation (2 of 3)
Retail employees often face heightened risks of exploitation due to poverty, migration, discrimination, cultural norms and limited access to education.
https://www.neighbourly.com/jdfoundation
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur | Organisation’s response: Within your own operations. |
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country |
Organisation’s response:
|
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Global Modern Slavery Training rolled out to all employees to ensure that risks are understood, red flags can be spotted and the reporting is safe and robust within a process that is victim led at all times. We have strong DEI programmes and ensure inclusitivity across all areas of our direct business where everyone has value. Our charity work across the group supports our demographic within retail and our communities in which we operate. https://www.neighbourly.com/jdfoundation |
Priority risks for this organisation (3 of 3)
Goods Not for Resale (GNFR)
These workers include cleaning, logistics & catering within our operations, is high risk. We work with UnSeen to ensure risks are identified across our peer groups.
| Questions we asked about this risk | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Where it was most likely to occur | Organisation’s response: Within your own operations. |
| Who was it most likely to affect |
Organisation’s response:
|
| In which country | Organisation’s response: United Kingdom |
| Actions or plans to address this risk | Organisation’s response: Workers within these sectors may be at increased risk of modern slavery due to factors such as low-paid & temporary employment, the use of labour agencies, migrant labour, subcontracting arrangements and limited visibility beyond first tier of the supply chain. Through the Procurement Team we upload all of the contractors to the UnSeen webstie and collaborate with other businesses on issues which are reported on the platform, operating a combined approach to resolution with the relevent company |
Indicators of forced labour (optional)
We asked the organisation whether its statement refers to finding any International Labour Organization (ILO) indicators of forced labour.
What are ILO indicators of forced labour?
The International Labour Organization (ILO) has produced a list of the most common signs of forced labour.
They’re based on the definition of forced labour as ‘all work or service which is extracted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.’
More details and guidance are available on the ILO website, and in their publication ILO indicators of forced labour
| ILO indicators we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Abuse of vulnerability | Yes |
| Deception | Yes |
| Restriction of movement | Yes |
| Isolation | No |
| Physical and sexual violence | Yes |
| Intimidation and threats | Yes |
| Retention of identity documents | Yes |
| Withholding of wages | Yes |
| Debt bondage | Yes |
| Abusive working and living conditions | Yes |
| Excessive overtime | Yes |
| Other |
-
|
Actions taken in response to finding ILO indicators
We asked the organisation to tell us whether its statement refers to any actions it took after finding indicators of forced labour
| Actions we asked about | Organisation’s response |
|---|---|
| Financial remediation, including repayment of recruitment fees | No |
| Change in policy | No |
| Change in training | Yes |
| Referring potential victims to government services | Yes |
| Supporting victims via NGO | Yes |
| Supporting investigations by relevant authorities | Yes |
| Other |
-
|
Demonstrating progress (optional)
We asked the organisation how its statement demonstrates progress over time in addressing modern slavery risks.
They provided the following answer:
We set KPIs on:
1)Number of collegues trained globally & regular meetings with Welfare sponsors who are 2nd level trained with regular check-ins
2)Transparancy on non-compliances open & closed & the classification of the root causes
We do not set KPIs on the number of cases we investigate - our policy is "if we dont find any, we are not looking in the right places" Success comes from reports in direct operations. Our policy is Victim led - we are unable to disclose some statistics.